Findings

What the reviews have found.

Cumulative across every completed engagement, computed from the same ledger the homepage reads. Figures are de-identified: no client, no claimant, no provider, no payer, no case number, no date of service. Every one of them traces to a determination cited to a record page in the delivered work product, and every page count below is taken from that matter's own meter certificate rather than from any document written about it. A matter whose pages cannot be traced to a certificate is not published here at all.

315

medical record productions reviewed

99,229

pages received and metered across the client productions: 95,492 unique once files proven byte-identical were excluded

3,625

charges classified, each call cited to the record page it rests on

≈1,985 Hours

for one reviewer to read all 99,229 pages by hand, at 50 pages an hour for clean records

≈248 Days

of page-by-page reading, at eight hours a day

1 to 12 business days

the published Etiology turnaround, set by the size of the file

	Demanded	Related	Gray — open	Not related
Past medicals	$3,923,886.64	$372,114.11	$3,695,720.47	$1,297,465.77
Future care, as demanded	$4,584,853.06	$160,000.00	—	—

Matter by matter

What each analysis found, generalised.

Figures below are rounded and every clinical, procedural and structural particular is omitted, deliberately. The pattern is the product, not the file. Anyone entitled to the exact figures on a matter already holds the delivered analysis, where each one is cited to its page. The 5 most recent are set out in full; the running ledger beneath them carries every completed review.

Matter 15
2026
none
is demanded as future care, and none can accrue on this claim. The demand carries past expense only, so the past column is the whole of the medical claim.
about $380
an arithmetic error on the face of the claimant's own schedule: the stated total and the sum of its own components do not agree by this much.
about $2,800
of past medicals the record could not resolve either way, carried GRAY with the specific document that would resolve each one named in the analysis.
Matter 14
2026
about $580,000
demanded as future care. No plan was produced behind it: no itemization, no unit costs, and no professional document supporting the figure. Carried GRAY in full.
about $12,000
an arithmetic error on the face of the claimant's own schedule: the stated total and the sum of its own components do not agree by this much.
about $9,900
of past medicals the record could not resolve either way, carried GRAY with the specific document that would resolve each one named in the analysis.
about $5,700
of past medicals the provider billed as single lines covering two different kinds of care, carried MIXED. These cannot take a causation screen until the bill itself is separated, and the analysis names the document that would separate each group.
Matter 13
2026
none
is demanded as future care, and none can accrue on this claim. The demand carries past expense only, so the past column is the whole of the medical claim.
about $120
an arithmetic error on the face of the claimant's own schedule: the stated total and the sum of its own components do not agree by this much.
about $150,000
of past medicals the record could not resolve either way, carried GRAY with the specific document that would resolve each one named in the analysis.
Matter 12
2026
none
is demanded as future care, and none can accrue on this claim. The demand carries past expense only, so the past column is the whole of the medical claim.
about $2,100
separates two of the claimant's own priced documents valuing the same care. Not an error of addition inside one schedule, but two schedules that cannot both be right.
about $1,100
of past medicals the record could not resolve either way, carried GRAY with the specific document that would resolve each one named in the analysis.
about $40,000
of past medicals the provider billed as single lines covering two different kinds of care, carried MIXED. These cannot take a causation screen until the bill itself is separated, and the analysis names the document that would separate each group.
Matter 11
2026
none
is claimed as future care and none is projected — but the production stops while care is still being given rather than concluding, and nothing in it closes that care out. The absence is reported, not treated as an answer.
about $45,000
of produced charges appear nowhere on the claimant's own schedule at all. The schedule reconciles exactly to the bills it does list; this was found by reading the billing rather than the schedule.
about $140,000
of past medicals the record could not resolve either way, carried GRAY with the specific document that would resolve each one named in the analysis.

The running ledger.

Every completed review, newest first — the 5 above and all9 before them. Demanded is what the claimant asked for; the three call columns divide what the review actually located in the productions, which is a different pool. Rounded, and scrollable.

Matter	Year	Pages, unique	Demanded	Related	Gray	Mixed	Not related
15	2026	511	about $110,000	$0	about $2,800	—	about $100,000
14	2026	2,958	about $37,000	about $8,600	about $9,900	about $5,700	about $13,000
13	2026	11,390	about $170,000	about $15,000	about $150,000	—	about $280,000
12	2026	446	about $79,000	about $34,000	about $1,100	about $40,000	about $3,600
11	2026	8,583	about $160,000	about $2,700	about $140,000	—	about $14,000
10	2026	18,612	none made	about $100,000	about $170,000	—	about $390,000
09	2026	3,348	about $62,000	$0	about $29,000	—	about $33,000
08	2026	4,781	about $4,100	about $3,400	about $2,300	—	about $38,000
07	2026	15,456	about $350,000	$0	about $230,000	—	about $69,000
06	2026	887	about $120,000	$0	about $3,000	—	about $120,000
05	2026	2,090	about $200,000	about $180,000	about $410,000	—	about $810
04	2026	2,020	about $130,000	about $6,100	about $120,000	—	about $4,400
03	2026	12,196	about $1.8 million	$0	about $1.8 million	—	about $13,000
02	2026	12,214	about $720,000	about $26,000	about $580,000	—	about $230,000

Past medicals only. Future care is set out per matter above, because a future demand and an absent one are different facts and a column cannot hold that difference.

De-identified. Actor referred to throughout as the plaintiff/patient. No age, condition, procedure, care setting, mechanism, date of service, provider, payer or geography below the state is published on this page.

What the reviews have found.

What each analysis found, generalised.

The running ledger.

Start with the file.