What the reviews have found.

The demand against the record

10,130 charges classified: $11,144,317.64 in billed line items. The three call columns divide every charge the review located in the productions, which is not the same pool as the schedule a claimant asserts. Demanded and classified are set out separately for that reason.

Billed amounts, not amounts anybody paid. Percentages, where shown, are of the classified total captured from the billing productions, not of the demand.

Matter by matter

What each analysis found, generalised.

Every clinical, procedural and structural particular is omitted, deliberately. The pattern is the product, not the file. The 5 most recent are set out below, each naming what was distinctive about that analysis and the figure it rests on; the running ledger beneath them carries every completed review, rounded.

• Matter 25

  2026-09

  Nothing is related. No line of any bill is for the four days claimed.

  Related: $0.00

  Not one dollar. A related charge is one that would not exist had the break been found four days sooner. No bill carries a line aimed at the spinal cord: no brace, no pressure relief priced apart from the fusion. The monitoring was done and nobody billed it.

  Not related: $941,154.77

  Over nine tenths of everything priced. The care the cardiac arrest needed was already running when those four days began: breathing machine, cooling, the brain work up for oxygen loss, the defibrillator. The rest is the operation this break always needs.

  Gray, open: $65,597.69

  Six blocks of care, and not one leans related. All of it turns on amounts no charge line shows: what hardware the break needed, how long the hospital stay ran, and what level of follow on care finding it sooner would have meant.Resolves on the findings on how much therapy the patient could take, which set the care level, then a surgeon's opinion on hardware and length of stay

  $1,006,752.46

  Everything the bills add up to, and nobody has put a figure against it. There is no demand, no list of past medical charges claimed and no claim for repayment anywhere in the file, and twelve kinds of future care are reviewed with no plan behind any of them.

• Matter 24

  2026-09

  The fault claimed is the delay, not the injury. The money stays open.

  Gray, open: $302,511.31

  Five sixths of everything priced, and one seventeen day stay is most of that. That one bill covers cancer surgery she needed anyway, an infected pocket of fluid that needed draining anyway, and a blocked kidney tube nobody acted on, written down on day five.Resolves on an expert on how long that stay would have run if the kidney tube had been found and fixed the same day, and the billing code detail

  Related: $40,243.89

  The only care that exists because the kidney tube was injured: the scan that found the blockage, the look inside the bladder, the tube placed to drain the kidney, the drain and the stay that followed. It is small because the yardstick is a same day repair.

  $127,761.11

  This much of the past medical bill the demand states is priced nowhere in what was sent. Sixteen of the 38 episodes of care show up in the records with no charge attached anywhere, so they cannot go on either side of the line.

  Gray, open: $21,776.51

  Of the open money, this much leans related and only $2,325.00 leans the other way. What leans related is scans and lab work done during the delay, including one blood panel that flagged the kidneys five weeks before anyone named the blockage.Resolves on the order form behind each study, showing who ordered it and why, and the lab result reports themselves

• Matter 23

  2026-09

  Fault was found. No charge on either bill treats the harm claimed.

  Related: $0.00

  Not one dollar. The harm claimed is forty-five minutes lost on the way to the procedure that opens the artery, and lost time has no charge line of its own: the same heart catheter, the same stents, the same intensive care.

  Not related: $246,443.99

  The whole first hospital stay. It treated a real heart attack, the artery found completely blocked, and nobody is accused of causing that. The catheter work, the three stents and the intensive care were needed by what they found, whatever the timing.

  Gray, open: $54,577.32

  The whole second hospital stay, and it rests on one question no record answers: where the blood around the heart came from. If the damaged heart muscle tore, the return is outside the claim. If a procedure caused it, or the blood thinners did, it is not.Resolves on the catheter and ultrasound images themselves, not the reports, the drained fluid's blood count against the blood, then an opinion on cause

  Gray, open: $6,592.00

  Of the open money, this much leans related: draining the fluid, the scan that found it around the heart, the lab study of the fluid, and the blood counts that record the bleeding. Nothing leans the other way, and that is a finding, not an oversight.Resolves on an opinion on what caused the bleeding, given after those images are read and not before

• Matter 22

  2026-09

  The facility found the wound on day two. How far it grew is open.

  Gray, open: $68,225.69

  Of this, $67,633.49 leans related, nearly all one twenty-nine day long term hospital stay. The wound at the base of the spine was found within a day of arrival, so what is open is how much of it the same wound, treated properly, would still have needed.Resolves on a wound or infection specialist splitting those days between the wounds and two conditions the claim does not raise

  $92,231.41

  More than half of a demand that calls itself a minimum has no bill behind it: the stay where the dead tissue was cut away, hospice, ambulance, and an amount above the one claimed bill produced. Nothing at all is claimed for the facility being sued.

  Related: $12,739.24

  The suction pump on the wound and its supplies, and six weeks of antibiotics for a bone infection at the base of the spine that a bone sample pointed to and no test confirmed, plus the lab work that followed.

  Not related: $6,762.52

  Medicines for illnesses that were there before the stay complained of, swallowing and breathing care for food going down the wrong way that was already happening, a urine sample that grew yeast, and an emergency visit twelve weeks earlier that nobody claims.

• Matter 21

  2026-09

  The claim is one day of delay. No bill in the file charges for it.

  Related: $0.00

  Not one dollar, past or future. No bill charges for the day of delay itself, and nothing in the file prices one day's wait in a heart attack of this kind. Whether anything lands here needs a doctor's opinion on cause, and nobody has asked for one.

  Not related: $390,952.49

  Of this, $368,053.27 treated the heart attack and was needed either day: the artery was already completely blocked, and the first blood test on arrival read above what the lab could measure. The rest treats other illnesses, some of it four years earlier.

  Gray, open: $41,172.82

  Two later hospital stays whose bills mix two kinds of care. One is a return three days after going home with low potassium, on a water pill started at that discharge: too close to call. The other is for dizziness already there on arrival, leaning not related.Resolves on each stay's own line by line bill, which exists, and a doctor's opinion on whether the delay raised the need for the water pill

  Gray, open: $120,881.00

  Most of the future care the demand prices, with no formal plan behind it. Medicines come as one yearly lump with no breakdown by drug and lean not related. Scans and rehab at counts no record supplies, plus a reserve for emergencies, are too close to call.Resolves on a breakdown by drug, how often the heart doctor wants checks done, and whether rehab was ever referred or attended

De-identified. Actor referred to throughout as the plaintiff/patient. No age, condition, procedure, care setting, mechanism, date of service, provider, payer or geography below the state is published on this page.